ALTERNATIVE FUELS
Aviation Fuel
Aviation Industry Support For Alternative Jet Fuel
By: Robert C. Hackney
for Private Jet Magazine
March 2009
Two major initiatives are moving
forward in the aviation industry in support of the development and use of
alternatives to traditional jet fuel. The two major movements are the
Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group and the Commercial Aviation
Alternative Fuels Initiative. While they sound about the same, there are a
few important differences in these movements.
A major impetus for the creation of these movements seems
to be that in 2006, for the first time in history, the single largest
component of U.S. airline operation costs became the fuel component.
Industry experts indicate that there are 75,000 scheduled commercial flights
per day in the world. While the aviation industry does not account for
nearly as much carbon dioxide as motor vehicles (about 1/9), it has a
substantial impact, since it affects the upper atmosphere. The release of so
much carbon dioxide into the upper layers of the atmosphere creates a large
negative environmental impact. So, taking into account rising costs and
environmental concerns, the development of cost effective alternative fuels
that reduce greenhouse gas emissions is at the top the aviation industry's
hit list.
We will attempt to explain the differences between these
two loosely assembled groups. The Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group was
announced in September 2008. It consists primarily of ten airlines that
account for 15% of commercial aviation fuel demand. Advising the group are
two major environmental groups, the World Wildlife Fund and the Natural
Resources Defense Council.
The Group has agreed to various commitments which will be
verifiable. The first of these
commitments
is that the development of such fuels will be made in a way that is
non-competitive with food sources, and will not jeopardize drinking water
supplies. In addition, they will consider the total lifecycle of greenhouse
gas emissions which means that they will look at how plants are grown,
harvested and processed, not just their effect upon use. In developing
counties, they have committed to improve socio-economic conditions for local
farmers and not displace local populations. Finally, they agree not to clear
high conservation areas such as tropical rainforests to develop plants for
jet fuel production.
The development of government policies to promote the use
of sustainable, low carbon aviation fuels is also one of the goals of the
Sustainable Aviation Fuel
Users
Group. An international consortium, known as the Roundtable on Sustainable
Biofuels, has developed principles and criteria for sustainable biofuel
production, which the Group has agreed to adopt, along with the requirement
to third party verification. These criteria are referred to as “Version
Zero.”
The Group is focused on supporting research into two
potential bio-fuel sources that meet their standards and criteria; jatropha
curcas and algae. Bio-fuels from these two sources are hoped to perform as
well as traditional jet fuel while leaving a smaller carbon footprint.
The Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative, or
CAAFI, is a much broader spectrum group that is united in a much looser
fashion than the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group. The CAAFI has much
more diverse participants, and its goals are to share and collect data and
“motivate and direct research on aviation alternative fuels.” The CAAFI also
has a “specific goal of enhancing the energy supply.”
Participants in CAAFI include government agencies such as
the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, NASA, the Department of
Transportation and, of course, the Federal Aviation Administration. Other
participants include fuel suppliers, airlines, universities and various
trade associations which represent manufacturers, airlines, airports and
other aviation trade groups.
A main focus of the CAAFI is creating standards for
certification and qualification of alternative fuels. As part of this focus
the group's goals include planning for certification of a 50% synthetic fuel
in 2008, a 100% synthetic fuel in 2010 and bio-fuels in 2013. They are also
involved in educating the public and private sectors and disseminating
flight-test information on synthetic fuels and bio-fuels. Like the
Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group, the CAAFI also supports research and
development on low carbon fuels sourced from plants, algae and biomass. The
CAAFI holds an annual meeting to assess the status of alternative fuel
development and to identify areas of focus for the future.
In summary, the CAAFI is more of a broad based, industry
wide, networking group that shares information and works on creating
industry standards and criteria, while the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users
Group is a more closely knit group of fuel consumers, more focused on the
actual research and development of alternative fuels. Obviously, both groups
overlap, and both provide support and incentive for their participants to
develop sustainable jet fuel alternatives.
Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group
Terrance Scott
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
About the Author:
Robert C. Hackney practices law in Palm Beach County, Florida, and also
serves as Executive Director of the Alternative Energy Association, a
Florida not for profit corporation. He has lectured and authored a number of
publications including The Energy Revolution – 277 Things Every American
Needs to Know About the New Energy Paradigm. He also serves on the Advisory
Board for the International Green Technology Center, and represents a number
of companies active in the alternative energy industry. Information about
the Alternative Energy Association can be found at
http://www.alternativeenergyassn.com/